- 11,823
- 14,471
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2013
Very unpopular opinion but I do like this a tad more than la to chi. Granted I don't have la to chi, so I can't comment on quality as a part of that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
NyC to Pari has better feeling leather. The only reason I sold mine is b/c I didn't like that under coat.Very unpopular opinion but I do like this a tad more than la to chi. Granted I don't have la to chi, so I can't comment on quality as a part of that.
Yes, unds.was this you undsing them b/c a few dunks have this problem if so?
yeah these, jedi's, mosiquito's, stussy's, and some others tend to have this aging problem. It's best to buy those & others w/ similar materials used. they pretty much rot otherwise.Yes, unds.
The toe box is this sticky, rubbery
material that winds up turning into
gravel/tar like substance when creased.
People must be trippin when they say the TS Dunks were wack. I know hype just killed it for them, but these are some clean on foot pics
Lighting, although the midsole on the left shoe (on the right in the photo) is a tab bit more yellow. iPhone 11 is really dodgy when trying to compensate for light and white balance.vinnuendo is it the lighting in the pic or is the suede on the right shoe a good bit darker?
After one wear.
I’d avoid SBTGs at all cost tbh.
damn thats tough. such a cool looking shoes but gimmicky material for the LOSS. I wonder if you treat it with Mink Oil or something to soften the leather. I was thinking of buying a pair of Stock X but thanks clarifying.
How much is a 9/10 no heel drag, minimal creasing size 10.5 diamond low sbs go for now? I been out the game for too long. Thanks in advance
People must be trippin when they say the TS Dunks were wack. I know hype just killed it for them, but these are some clean on foot pics
I still think they're gross. Too much going on with the patterns and I dislike the khaki/blue combo.Said the same thing around release time. Some people were in here saying these were only sought after because TS name was attached to it, but I think that it would be sought after even without because it's a dope colorway in general.
I personally think they’re OK, but not over $1000 OK. Even if every detail that affiliated them with Travis was turned to say a regular Nike or Dunk detail (like the debossed print around the back collar just saying “DUNK” or “NIKE,” the tongue tag being the standard “Nike SB w/ Swoosh,” or the print under the paisley being just normal Elephant print), the shoe would definitely still be sought after. Lots of details, and a unique combination of details and such, that the shoes definitely are different. But for me personally, they’re too much (paisley mixed with flannel print?), and I’m not a huge fan of the colors (weird eggshell beige/khaki and brown and black, whereas more black would’ve been better IMO (like a black outsole)). Their uniqueness and details would’ve made them sought after regardless, but them being hundreds of dollars above some classics from the different Dunk eras over 10 years ago is SOLELY due to the TS affiliation IMO. But not knocking anyone who loves them. Opinions are dope like.People must be trippin when they say the TS Dunks were wack. I know hype just killed it for them, but these are some clean on foot pics
Always feel weird linking to posts/accounts that I'm sure 99% of ya'll follow and have already seen... but here's another shot of the Medicoms.
which one? There’s like 4 pairs now