- 492
- 85
Probably tiffs. Again. That would be the 4th time? Restock yoths or somps. But that definitely won't happen.
2024 NIKE SB DUNK THREAD_____GRs and QSs added
- Thread in 'Nike Retro' Thread starter Started by elcerrito91,
- Start date
- 764
- 406
somps never released on NDC
- 1,209
- 309
Papapraziiii?
- 112
- 27
Nah. Bachelors in journalism.
But using pics of a different shoe in better condition than the one actually being sold sure sounds like deception in the pursuit of profit. Hence "fraud."
- 492
- 85
Valid point. And yoths weren't a premium if I remember correctly.
- 7,229
- 2,375
31st states didn't release in anything smaller than a 7 on NDC---how magically they gon' have a 6 and 6.5??Little SB restock
#suspect
Last edited:
- 1,209
- 309
When they drop, let me know.
- 338
- 223
They did tho. Got my pair from Premier. Nike just didn't sell them. They're always suspect with saying what starts at size 7 or 8 and then I see a 6 pop up on flight club for some exorbitant fee.
- 492
- 85
Also what's the point of restocking Bp's when Ndc has a fsr. I did just see lm's on a list, but it's a different list also claiming a red October restock so it could be bs
- 7,229
- 2,375
I said "on NDC".... meaning on that website, they didn't release anything smaller than a 7.
- 13,597
- 26,331
NDC = Nike Dot Com
- 338
- 223
ah. Missed that part. My bad. Like I said, they're always shady with that.I said "on NDC".... meaning on that website, they didn't release anything smaller than a 7.
- 7,229
- 2,375
^ true...
my thing is according to that list , which is the master NDC restock list, they have Cali's restocking in sizes smaller than a 7. Just seems odd to me since those sizes weren't available to begin with.
my thing is according to that list , which is the master NDC restock list, they have Cali's restocking in sizes smaller than a 7. Just seems odd to me since those sizes weren't available to begin with.
- 5,390
- 2,593
I LITERALLY couldn't disagree with you more. It is the SELLER'S OBLIGATION to show all flaws, whether affecting wearability or not, and if you don't that is both dishonest AND against most marketplace rules (whether the marketplace be Kixify, eBay, etc) or even against the law. There's a reason that Significantly Not As Described is a viable PayPal claim to make. The defects of the shoe are obviously not in the control of the seller, but showing the flaws is entirely in the seller's control. You and I both know how crazy shoe geeks can get about minor or major flaws. For me, if that happened, I wouldn't even contact the guy I'd just file a dispute immediately. It's one thing to list stock photos if your pair is Brand New without flaws or defects. It is another thing entirely to list a brand new pair with defects and have stock photos with no mention in the description of those flaws. It is actually illegal to misrepresent your product like that. It is tortuous to misrepresent any product so long as it can result in monetary loss. In this instance, say he wanted to buy the shoes to save and resell. Well, now he may not be able to resell because of the factory flaws that were not listed. This is an offense that you can be sued for, generally so long as the monetary loss is significant enough. I don't see how it's somehow alright to do something illegal on a smaller scale.
- 5,390
- 2,593
- 411
- 196
Damn, a bunch of lame Jordan color ways on that list
- 2,106
- 702
Do the Flash come in the all teal or teal/black box?
- 117
- 86
The lunar janoskis came in all teal, not sure about the dunks!
- 17,129
- 8,043
what does yeezy mean???
- 461
- 436
- 4,090
- 21,647
Yeezy = An Overhyped Celebrity
- 5,390
- 2,593
- 17,129
- 8,043
- 1,209
- 309
It's actually the YIKES of Scooby.
- 4,413
- 515
Got mine for 59 shipped, better than original price lol
