2024 NIKE SB DUNK THREAD_____GRs and QSs added

Individual sellers being held accountable for Nike's (lack of) QC.

Interesting.

If you bought a pair from Flight Club that had the same defects, would you still be making such a fuss out of it, knowing that they use stock images exclusively?
 
Last edited:
Didn't mean to start a firestorm.. Going to start a dialogue with the seller before I take any action.

Meanwhile - broke out my #seacrystalsundays
400
 
 
Seller should be responsible if the listing's images do not represent the shipped product. Not the buyer's fault that the seller is too lazy/busy to take accurate pictures.
We're not talking about sellers with used shoes hiding flaws, we're talking about sellers with new shoes potentially unknowingly not showing factory defects...apples to oranges, my opinion is steadfast, buyer has no beef here (with the seller, at least).
were 100% talking about hiding flaws. if there is a flaw, even on a new shoe and it isnt stated in the description or shown in pictures, the sold item is eligible for returns by the buyer. if you buy shoes, get them in hand you should look at them before you ship them out. its not like he hasnt had the shoes in hand for over a month now
 
Individual sellers being held accountable for Nike's (lack of) QC.

Interesting.

If you bought a pair from Flight Club that had the same defects, would you still be making such a fuss out of it, knowing that they use stock images exclusively?

Yes I would return them
 
Whatever man, I digress...I didn't realize the fickleness of this thread...do you, get that partial refunded d00d.
 
Hey guys, I'm in a little dilemma and could use some advice or input related to what ya'll talking about.

Recently bought deadstock Unkle from someone in an SB group on facebook.  First thing I asked when we talked was if it was fading as I didn't want a new condition-faded shoe.  He said none at all, ***** pink.  He sent pictures, and gave me his word that it is not faded.  The pictures do look a little faded, but the thing about pictures is that in different lighting it looks different.  Very hard to tell, that's why I asked for his word.  He's an admin in another group and that makes his word more credible apparently.

Long story short, these came in and they are a little more faded than my VNDS pair I bought previously.  Now, I paid what I feel is top dollar for this pair.  I'm a little disappointed that they came in not "not faded"  but I'm not looking to make enemies with an admin or get banned from the group.  But this is my hard earned money and I paid a grip for them.  Would you guys ask for a full refund or partial?  Or eat it up since he did send pictures of the shoe?
 
 
Hey guys, I'm in a little dilemma and could use some advice or input related to what ya'll talking about.

Recently bought deadstock Unkle from someone in an SB group on facebook.  First thing I asked when we talked was if it was fading as I didn't want a new condition-faded shoe.  He said none at all, ***** pink.  He sent pictures, and gave me his word that it is not faded.  The pictures do look a little faded, but the thing about pictures is that in different lighting it looks different.  Very hard to tell, that's why I asked for his word.  He's an admin in another group and that makes his word more credible apparently.

Long story short, these came in and they are a little more faded than my VNDS pair I bought previously.  Now, I paid what I feel is top dollar for this pair.  I'm a little disappointed that they came in not "not faded"  but I'm not looking to make enemies with an admin or get banned from the group.  But this is my hard earned money and I paid a grip for them.  Would you guys ask for a full refund or partial?  Or eat it up since he did send pictures of the shoe?
sounds like the same situation. try and work out a partial refund which you think is fair, if you cant agree on anything bring pp into it.
 
400

Weren't these lows?

I saw these months ago on a fb group. Some kind made a custom pair and was actually taking orders for them for like 150, buyer supplies shoe. This may not be the same though.

But on the topic, any word on what is possibly the premier collab/yeezy/space tiger 2 release?
 
I just noticed that they have a little pattern on the back of them similar to the 3m hits on the paparazzi dunks. Kind of a turn off from the shoe but I still dig it
 
Do the MF Dooms come in black or gold box? I see eBay listings with both.


reverse of what bballermarkie bballermarkie said they came out originally at the tail end of 07 in the black box, then were reissued in early 08 in the gold box as a wider release. They kind of fell to the drama that were the Freddy Kreugers as part of that group of releases.
 
Do the MF Dooms come in black or gold box? I see eBay listings with both.


reverse of what bballermarkie bballermarkie said they came out originally at the tail end of 07 in the black box, then were reissued in early 08 in the gold box as a wider release. They kind of fell to the drama that were the Freddy Kreugers as part of that group of releases.

Yup my bad I always think gold box came before black. I figured they'd go silver then black which doesn't make since pink is in between them anyway...I digress
 
My buddy got DS pusheads from fcla. They didn't have the hang tag. I would have returned them myself.
 
Back
Top Bottom