- Mar 30, 2007
- 151,255
- 202,693
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Realistically what’s the market for Fields? A first?Looking at that trade list, if you are the Bears......
Do you build around Fields with a couple of those picks,
Or...
Take QB at #1 and the extra picks you could get for Fields? (And the extra two years reset on your QB deal)
Realistically what’s the market for Fields? A first?
Looking at that trade list, if you are the Bears......
Do you build around Fields with a couple of those picks,
Or...
Take QB at #1 and the extra picks you could get for Fields? (And the extra two years reset on your QB deal)
In the situation as a new GM, I'd cut the losses. I'd hate giving up a talent like Fields, but that is probably the worst roster in the NFL and they wont be doing any winning on his rookie deal anyway...trade Fields, trade down and get multiple higher end picks. Still gonna suck next season to get a top 5 pick...get a bridge Q like a Jimmy G (though he may be more better suited for a quasi-contender). Get started on the next great Bears D first, trenches...as long as they stay outdoors, that's their MO.
I hope Hooker falls to the Raiders in the early 3rd round.
The stories write themselves sometimes. HopefullyVegas does make sense for Hooker's.
The funny thing is this is a religious HookerVegas does make sense for Hooker's.
Fields showed enough to be the guy at least next year. Get trade assets and put him in the best position to succeed with weapons and a good O Line. You’re doing the evaluation of your young QB if you don’t provide him those things at a minimumLooking at that trade list, if you are the Bears......
Do you build around Fields with a couple of those picks,
Or...
Take QB at #1 and the extra picks you could get for Fields? (And the extra two years reset on your QB deal)