- Sep 18, 2003
- 61,864
- 134,086
They won in that color combo but they should go back to 80s/90s colors
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Playing fast doesn’t equal 100% effort is true and hilarious. Russ probably thinks the opposite
addict4sneakers you cop the KD’s and balled in them yet?
Feels like now would be a time to rebrand with the new young talent the team has.
Jerseys been lowkey trash since Nike got the licensing back. Teams like Orlando should only be wearing the pinstripes or TMac era with the stars. Same with Toronto and the TRex or AI era Philly. Just slap a swoosh on it give it the modern cut and they’re good.Look like practice jerseys. There so many better designers on Twitter and IG. These simplistic jerseys ain’t it. Bring back the fun designs of the 90s.
Jerseys been lowkey trash since Nike got the licensing back. Teams like Orlando should only be wearing the pinstripes or TMac era with the stars. Same with Toronto and the TRex or AI era Philly. Just slap a swoosh on it give it the modern cut and they’re good.
Baseball rarely does rebrands because the uni’s and logos for most teams are already iconic and you don’t mess with that. Miami lost, Florida Marlins used to be top 5.
Selflessness
Playing fast doesn’t equal 100% effort is true and hilarious. Russ probably thinks the opposite
Probably. I mean Nike does the swingmans that’s a call back to old logos, I dunno if the team or brand trademarks the logos. Nike took over in Baseball and all the majestic stuff remained so I’m leaning toward the team owning all logos.If I recall correctly, all of those were Champion jerseys, correct? Are there potentially licensing/trademark reasons why Nike cannot use those designs?
Didn’t even think of this. That would make sense.If I recall correctly, all of those were Champion jerseys, correct? Are there potentially licensing/trademark reasons why Nike cannot use those designs?