- Dec 7, 2018
- 2,267
- 5,926
Ive waited since 2000 for a decent looking retro of these, they look super nice they did a nice job on these as far as the appearance goes. as far as quality goes omg these are cheaply made, as soon as i picked them up they felt like fakes did 10 years ago. anybody who owned ogs back in the day will understand. Air jordans used to be superior quality over most shoes latest greatest materials even over other nikes they had a huge amount of quality put into them ... these are the opposite. these 2019 6s feel like an empty shell or ghost of what an og used to be. this is the first retro ive bought that nike has done and I wanted to return based on quality. I was at least hoping for BM5 nubuck .. these are horrible quality even the maroon 6s are totally better quality. these 2019s lack materials and padding big time. holding them in my hand really hits home when the ogs were nikes flagship shoes and were such high quality. if the bc4 are like these I might cry
As an og head myself, I partially agree. The ogs of many Jordan’s are better than many retros. Especially the horrible incarnations released between 2008-2014.
That being said, I think your post paints a somewhat rosy view on the quality of some ogs. I loved the og Infrareds as much as the next person, but let’s not pretend that their quality was absolutely perfect. The durabuck would crack or chip after x amount of years, and more importantly, the midsole was made of open cell polyurethane which means the shoe would crack and crumble over time. Also, on one of my og pairs, I remember the spoiler becoming detached after about a year and a half of wearing, so the stitching wasn’t always on point either.
These newer retros on some of the older models are now being made with closed cell polyurethane. If so, this would make the retros BETTER quality than the og’s, in that aspect at least. Imo the quality on og Jordans got much better around the time the 9’s or 10’s dropped.
I disagree that the 91’s are THAT much better than the 19’s, and I’ve owned both. Only time will really tell. It will be interesting to see how wearable these new ones are in a decade.
I also disagree with the 99’ 4 being the only retro that’s as good as the og. The last two 11 retros are right there with the ogs in terms of both appearances and quality, and I could make the argument that the “space jam” 2016 is actually BETTER than the og 11 due to the stitching.
My point is, I love the ogs but let’s not paint a rosy picture of them either.
Last edited: