- 22,094
- 9,980
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2013
No I seen Jordan.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
That's because you're watching it in the year 2017. The game evolved, and so did the players.they can be ignored when the NBA was a JOKE before the 80's.......bruh i watch videos and i can not respect anyone that takes basketball serious before magic and bird came in .
They do talk about him all the time but not as the greatest ever when invoking ring culture. Why? Because it was a different time and only 8 teams. Nobody brings up Robert Horry, who has a lot of rings because he wasn't the focal point of the offense. If Bron ever gets 7 rings the argument will still be that he lost 4 times to get there. Just sayin ring culture is subjective...Ring culture but no one advocating B Russell and his 11 in 13 seasons. The reason Lebbys finals record is brought up is because if not how would his career be questioned otherwise. Like Rickey Bobby "If you're not first you're last" and those losses remove him from GOAT talk but his overall body of work makes him an all time great
People talk about Russell all the time, more old heads but that was definitely a different time with their only being 8 teams in the league. But he's still an all time great top 10 because those accomplishments can't be ignored.
Is Bron the greatest player y'all ever seen?
They do talk about him all the time but not as the greatest ever when invoking ring culture. Why? Because it was a different time and only 8 teams. Nobody brings up Robert Horry, who has a lot of rings because he wasn't the focal point of the offense. If Bron ever gets 7 rings the argument will still be that he lost 4 times to get there. Just sayin ring culture is subjective...
none of what you picked on was the point The subject was ring culture and how its applied. A role player was brought up because he has more rings than some all time greats but wait for it, he's a role player so his multitude of rings means nothing.They do talk about him all the time but not as the greatest ever when invoking ring culture. Why? Because it was a different time and only 8 teams. Nobody brings up Robert Horry, who has a lot of rings because he wasn't the focal point of the offense. If Bron ever gets 7 rings the argument will still be that he lost 4 times to get there. Just sayin ring culture is subjective...
What? Since the NBA/ABA merger in the mid 70s, league has pretty much been the same. There's been a few expansion teams but nothing dramatic when talking about 8 teams vs 30. And why are you even bringing up role players when talking about rings?
none of what you picked on was the point The subject was ring culture and how its applied. A role player was brought up because he has more rings than some all time greats but wait for it, he's a role player so his multitude of rings means nothing.
now youre getting itnone of what you picked on was the point The subject was ring culture and how its applied. A role player was brought up because he has more rings than some all time greats but wait for it, he's a role player so his multitude of rings means nothing.
Ring culture when talking about the greats has pretty much been consistent in the modern era. The number of wins matters far more than the number of appearances.
Is Bron the greatest player y'all ever seen?
When people say this you know they weren't watching the games.How kobe got his first 3
So your'e basing it on rings?3rd after MJ, Kobe in my lifetime. He may pass Kobe but I don't think he will pass MJ
Kobe did his thing, but Shaq won those rings
When people say this you know they weren't watching the games.