- 17,264
- 27,199
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2012
Ok, so we will do this.Is this how you really analyze basketball?
So and so is better than ____
so that automatically means the team is better. The disparity in these players are not great enough to say the Clippers are heads and shoulders better. Unless Deandre takes some huge leap forward to being a dominant center and the Memphis playrs take a huge step back, its not happening. The last 5 years have proven that.
The Clippers last year 53-29.
The grizzlies last year 42-40.
I think that makes them the better team.
This isn't 3 years ago when ZBO and Marc were in their primes. Both arent getting any better.
Winning 53 games with injuries is better than winning 42 games with injuries. There is no debate and pulling up **** from 5 years ago will not predict what will happen next year better than what happened last year. If that were the case, the Lakers would be relevant.
Last edited: