- Feb 17, 2007
- 21,784
- 2,957
Not if they had him. Forward thinking!
I miss when the Mariners were good and the Rangers and Angels sucked. Less competition for the division
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not if they had him. Forward thinking!
The point is that no one knows or can pinpoint the exact effect of steroids. It's an unknown thing. You can sit here and say that it makes ****** players good or it makes good players great. But if you're using a sample size of 3-5 players when the whole number is in the hundreds, then how accurate is your assumption? No one truly knows how much of a players' stats and performance you can take out because they used PED's. Pete Rose is a whole other subject, you can't compare these guys. The **** these guys did in the 90s wasn't even breaking the rules back then. So what, now you want to take the moral high road and kill these guys? How many of these fools of fans are trying to get Hank Aaron out of the Hall? How about Eddie Murray? Orlando Cepeda? Kirby? Anson, Speaker and Cobb?
I never liked him because he played a majority of the time for the Padres. But Khalil Greene looked smooth playing SS, almost looked effortless at times for him to make those plays.
The issue with the baseball voters is and always will be the importance of MLB's records. This is the largest issue here that is often talked about the least. Voters by and large will not care if you beat your wife or were racist or possibly popped caffeine pills to make it through games. They are going to care about "steroids." Because "steroids" made MLB's nice lists of all time records get completely turned over and none of the writers, aka caretakers, like that at all and in fact many lose sleep over it.
Part of MLB's foundation has always been DiMaggio's hit streak, Gehrig/Ripken's hit streaks, Hank's 755, Maris' 61, hell even Ruth's 60. These voters were raised on those numbers, went to bed reciting those numbers. Even the 500 and 600 HR club was such an exclusive club it was like a national holiday if anyone ever reached it and the player then would turn into gold.
Now this will never be the case again for the rest of our lives, and this is the issue with them. They hate it. What used to be baseball's foundation is now thrown out the window and the "new age players chemically cheated to screw this up." And now it is pay back time in the only way possible they can. With their votes.
In my opinion I'm not shocked any of this is happening although it's still fascinating to watch unfold and has been all week. And it is going to continue to entertain us (or infuriate us) for years and years as I do not see guys like Clemens and Bonds getting 75% of the vote any time soon after this inaugural year. You also do have to feel bad for the players with no suspicions as they are also getting the shaft too. Still, to me the HOF is always better off not letting enough players in than instead letting too many players in.
Proshares I agree with that, having 600+ voters or whatever with no care about their current status (as mentioned, many are no longer covering baseball) is basically a joke. Just in my area (Minnesota) I know of several of our local voters and I just laugh that they actually have a vote.
I go in phases with my preferences but for now I almost think the NFL way is the best route. Basically one voter per city plus 10 national media members. And they sit in a room and hash it out.
I do think that if this keeps up we are going to see an overhaul by Cooperstown, possibly minor but something.
for now I almost think the NFL way is the best route. Basically one voter per city plus 10 national media members. And they sit in a room and hash it out.
Not sure if posted yet:
Who is gonna start in CF for the Athletics? Crisp or Young? I like the Athletics in the West actually, they got a good one in former Nat Tommy Milone
Also really weird to see the Astros in the AL.