2016 Chevrolet Camaro - Convertible Revealed

[rfx45]

Definitely looks more like a mid-cycle facelift than an all new model.

 

[PRIME]

I thought the last one with the updated tails was the mid cycle model.

Chevy is just lazy as ****

 

[picasso swerve]

They shoudve angled it more or something, similar to how Ford redesign's the Mustang's tails for the past 2 gen's but overall they are pretty much based off the same design.

 

[rfx45]

They took the "evolution" approach but just seems like they didn't do enough, kind of reminds me of the next gen R8 but this one felt like less work went into it. I was expecting them to take some cues from the new Corvette and make it more sleek.

The performance better blow people away if they are going this route with the looks.

 

[nydunkhead]

I'll take it, if I got a new fast car i'd deff be looking into a Vette more but this model is pretty nice looking imo. I just hope they cut the weight down like the promised since its on the Alpha platform which is what the ATS is based on. IMO the last gen was too heavy at just about 4,000lbs.

 

[rfx45]

Just some rumors to get the thread moving and we'll see if it is confirmed tomorrow.

the new, lighter, Alpha platform Camaro gets the following engine options:

A 2.0-liter turbo four as the base engine with 270 horsepower and 290 lb-ft of torque
A 3.6-liter V6 with 330 HP and 275 lb-ft of torque as an option up from that
Or the SS with a 6.2-liter LT1 V8 with 440 HP and 450 lb-ft of torque

 

[Bert.]

Joint looks exactly the same.

Trash.

yup

they did better with the front end but its still garbage

that rear is terrible

 

[picasso swerve]

Turbo 4 banger with 270hp? Not too shabby.

 

[eugenile gts]

meh, new mustang i guess is what im going for

 

[rfx45]

This is supposedly from a leaked insider memo:

Technology

• All-new Driver Mode Control, which tailors up to eight vehicle attributes – from the dual-mode exhaust to throttle progression

• Magnetic Ride Control suspension, which is offered on the Camaro SS for the first time

• Segment-exclusive, Interior Spectrum Lighting that offers 24 different ambient lighting settings – and offers a “car show” mode

• High-definition, configurable color displays – including available dual 8-inch screens

• Available wireless phone charging and next-generation Chevrolet MyLink with new smartphone projection


Performance

• GM’s award-winning Alpha architecture enables a more nimble, responsive driving experience

o The new Camaro is at least 200 pounds lighter than previous model

o Although based on Alpha, 70 percent of the components are unique to Camaro

• The most powerful Camaro SS ever

o 6.2L LT1with estimated at 440 horsepower and 450 lb-ft of torque

• All-new 3.6L V-6 featuring direct injection, continuously variable valve timing and –for the first time – Active Fuel Management (cylinder deactivation)

o Estimated 330 horsepower and 275 lb-ft of torque

• Most efficient Camaro ever, delivering more than 30 MPG highway

o New 2.0L Turbo with an estimated 270 hp and 290 lb-ft

• Handling and performance for the Camaro SS approaches that of the fifth-generation models’ track-capable Camaro 1LE package


Design

• More athletic-looking, sculptured exterior that complements the tighter, leaner architecture

• Aerodynamically optimized design is the result of 350 hours of wind tunnel testing – with reduced drag on LT models and 30 percent improvement in lift downforce on SS

• All-new, driver-focused interior with intuitive controls, flat-bottom steering wheel, and high quality materials throughout

• Unique control rings around the air vents used for temperature and fan speed adjustments, eliminating the need for conventional buttons


Expected questions:

Q: When will the new Camaro: start production / go on sale / arrive at dealers?

A: We are not ready to discuss specific timing, but can tell you we expect the first Camaros to arrive at dealers by the end of 2015.

Q: How much will the Camaro cost? Will it be more/less than the current Camaro?

A: We are not ready to announce pricing. I can tell you the current Camaro ranges from $23,000 to $43,000 and we expect the new Camaro will have a similar range.

Q: Why is the Alpha-based Camaro “only” 200 pounds lighter that the old Camaro? The fifth-gen was so heavy, it should have been 500 pounds lighter.

A: A 200 pound savings is actually quite remarkable: The Alpha-architecture is very mass-efficient, however the exterior dimensions of the new Camaro are within 2 inches of the predecessor. The team looked for every opportunity to save mass –from increased use of aluminum to shortening the suspension bolts to save a few grams. The result can be immediately felt behind the wheel – as the new Camaro feels incredibly light, agile, and fun to drive.

Q: How fast will the 2.0L Turbo/V-6/V8 be 0-60/¼-mile/top speed/Lap times?

A: It is too soon to discuss specific performance numbers, as we are currently finalizing the tuning and calibration of the new car. All I can tell you is the new 2016 Camaro SS is already posting better lap times than the 2015 Camaro 1LE.

Q: When will theZ/28 / ZL1 / 1LE arrive?

A: We are not ready to discuss products beyond 2016 model year for competitive reasons. However, I can tell you we plan to introduce new models and special editions at least every year.

Q: Why would you offer a four-cylinder in the Camaro? Didn’t you learn your lesson with the Iron Duke?

A: With the Gen2 Camaro, we learned buyers are not willing to sacrifice performance for fuel economy. As such, the new Camaro 2.0L Turbo is impressive performance: The 2.0L Turbo delivers 270 horsepower – which is more than any V-8 offered from 1971 to 1995 – and it’s paired with a lighter, more nimble chassis that makes the Camaro exceptionally fun-to-drive.

Q: Why are you offering the four-cylinder as your base engine, and V6 as an option, when Mustang offers the V-6 as their base, and their EcoBoost as an upgrade?

A: We felt 4-6-8 was a more logical progression for customers as they look for the balance of performance and efficiency that fits their needs. It’s important to note that Mustang positions their V-6 as a low-volume, low-feature model. To get a well-optioned car, Ford forces you to upgrade to the EcoBoost. We are taking adifferent tact, allowing customers to build a well-equipped Camaro with their choice of engines.

Q : Why didn’t you fix the rearward visibility for the next-gen ? That was the single biggest complaint for the Gen 5.

A: We talked to many Gen 5 customers about the visibility, and they made it clear they were not willing to accept changing the appearance of the Camaro’s iconic silhouette for the sake or rear visibility. We are using increased levels of technology to help with visibility, including a standard back up camera on all models, and available rear sonar.

 

[andretti]

Chevy Chevy Chevy



I dont like this at all.


. Very disappoint

 

[JVII]

Q : Why didn’t you fix the rearward visibility for the next-gen ? That was the single biggest complaint for the Gen 5.

A: We talked to many Gen 5 customers about the visibility, and they made it clear they were not willing to accept changing the appearance of the Camaro’s iconic silhouette for the sake or rear visibility.

Stupid, stupid Camaro owners.

 

[BALH ENH]

Rather have a challenger.

i already have a 68

 

[teamjordan79]

mark wahlbergs in every movie now i swear

 

[dropten]

This guys render from April is pretty spot on
View media item 1535369View media item 1535372View media item 1535373

 

[slicknick951]

Q : Why didn’t you fix the rearward visibility for the next-gen ? That was the single biggest complaint for the Gen 5.

A: We talked to many Gen 5 customers about the visibility, and they made it clear they were not willing to accept changing the appearance of the Camaro’s iconic silhouette for the sake or rear visibility.

Stupid, stupid Camaro owners.

This

 

[sugafree]

69 > 82 > 70 > 10 >>>>> 96....dodo do do doooooo

You not about that performance life bra.....

1993-2002 the LT1/LS1 F Body era dominated Mustangs.

 

[dtb00201]

Months of teasers for a refresh lol

 

[tr1ll]

69 > 82 > 70 > 10 >>>>> 96....dodo do do doooooo

You not about that performance life bra.....

1993-2002 the LT1/LS1 F Body era dominated Mustangs.

I was talking about looks there...

 

[sugafree]

I was talking about looks there...

Oh Ok

 

[District of Columbia]

I have a 14 and the blind spot is horrible [emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji]

I can back up with no problems tho ..if you kno how to drive then you should be able to adjust to the visibility no prob ..I don't see wat the issue is

 

[keel252]

13 >

 

[omariwestafari]

We'll find out very soon but I still don't think it'll resemble that, looks very different from the silhouette revealed before. Front looks real aventador-like with it's edge and angles/jaggedness, kind of reminds me of the 70s Z28 front in a way.

There's been a rumor that the silhouette may have leaked/teased in a GM Presentation earlier this year

View media item 1513820View media item 1513822

U my dude and all but please dont ever put the butt ugly camaro in the same sentence as the beautifull piece of art that is the aventador

Very disrespectful man

 

[rfx45]

I just meant the jagged edges of the nose looks similar, just those things and nothing else. Like literally just those few inches of similarities.
View media item 1535525

 

[omariwestafari]

Nah fam im still not having it

Cant be doing that to them lambo designers