not interested in reggie. his attitude turns me off. type of dude that is talented but mentally wants to do too damn much and it'll hurt the team as a result. could see him butting heads with melo. leave him in detroit and let svg deal with him.
knight would be a good look but it'll cost.
that pacers series was some bull. tyson getting his salad tossed nightly against hibbert
I see what you are saying but IMO you gotta have a last resort PG option this summer.
We can't go into next season with Calderon/Galloway/Shved again. Like I said I want to draft Russell and if we don't draft him I think we should turn our attention to B-Knight.
But either Russell or Knight are far from guarantees. You gotta have a Plan C and D. No, I dont think Reggie is perfect. If Reggie was perfect he would be option A or B instead of C or D, and like I have said, I spent the majority of the season against bringing him into NY.
I understand his attitude could be tough to deal with sometimes, but at least his problem is wanting it too much as opposed to being lazy and/or soft. Sort of like a Westbrook mentality where you respect how much he wants it, but sometimes it gets in the way with playing smart basketball.
But if we miss out on Russell/Knight and we need a PG I still think that we should look his way. He just turned 25 (literally 2 days ago) and sometimes you need guys with a little dog in them and you know Jackson has got that. He is young and he shouldn't cost us so much, and he is one of the few free agents with a franchise PG level ceiling if we could adjust his attitude for the better and only use the positives.
Those kind of players often work out in NY. The players that often don't make it in NY because of attitude are the Eddy Curry/Bargnani types who are lazy and don't want it enough, yet for some reason we think we could turn them around. On the other hand it is the dudes like Starks or Spree or Oakley or whoever else that were known to be "head cases" in other cities, that often find success in NY. Often times their respective attitudes endeared them to this city and this fan base.
Maybe Reggie can be sort of like that. After all, like I have said in the past, I am unsure if there is a better basketball mind at dealing with bad attitudes over the course of NBA history than Phil Jackson. Once Phil gets his Zen Master paws on him anything can happen. And IMO in order for this Knicks team to reach their ceiling, we need a young PG who could connect with ex-triangle PG Derek Fisher and become an extention of what Fisher wants on the court. Fisher and Reggie used to be teammates in OKC and I could see the 2 forming an unlikely type of bond, and I think we need our PG to do that in order to be successful. I could definitely see Fisher forming that type of connection with D'Angelo Russell but I could see it in Jackson as well.
NY is the kind of place where we take in outsiders who the rest of the world turns on for having a "bad attitude" or being a "head case" and makes them one of our own. We are going to need a PG and I think Reggie could be a good option here. At least a better option than anyone I can think of after Russell and Knight. After all like I said dude is 25 and will play all of next season at 25 years old. He still has a lot of growing left to do. In addition to that over the last 16 games of this season he averaged 19.9 points, 4.9 rebounds and 10.9 dimes, while shooting 48 percent from the field, 39.1 percent beyond the arc and 75.3 percent at the stripe.
Keep in mind that this was Reggie's first chance as a starter. He has always been stuck behind Westbrook in OKC throughout his entire career and he might be ready to break out. Idk, just possibilities, my point is that I don't think we should cross Reggie off this summer just because of a "bad attitude." Many Knicks of the past have found success here despite a "bad attitude" and we need a ******* PG. Its the same thing with Demarcus Cousins, if you could ball you could ball and hopefully you mature as a person along the way.
Idk maybe I am reaching, all I am saying/asking is that if we don't get Russell or Knight, who would you prefer we realistically go after this summer than Reggie Jackson?
EDIT:
@THE GR8EST I think we're saying the same thing, that run that the Pacers had was impressive, but since that run in which they ran us over , I haven't seen Hibbert play the same way and I don't think it'll get better.
100% man. I was agreeing with you, just emphasizing how that makes it all the more frustrating.
Like why the **** couldnt that **** have happened in 2013 as opposed to them looking like the next dynasty in waiting the NBA has to offer?
Especially because if you had followed Hibbert his entire career, you kind of knew that his play during that series was a fluke. And if you are from NY you DEFINITELY knew that Lance was a ******* head case just waiting to happen