- Jan 11, 2013
- 18,115
- 11,770
i didnt know paying homage was slurpingIs this for real? AI took em to the finals so he can act however he wants? Shaq had the right to force them to choose because he's half the reason they went as far as they did? Hakeem is a humanitarian so should play well past his point of physical productivity? Ewing should've been brought back at his age... Just because?ai won a mvp and took them to the finals for the first time in forever, and they havent been back since so i'd say he earned the right to act however he wanted to esp. w the teams they put around him
shaq had every right to force them to choose, and they jerked him in his prime/ they owed him that loyalty for the 3peat
hakeem is a humanitarian and diplomat/ambassador. on top of all the philanthropic/goodwill missions he does, he earned that right as well to play as long he felt like bringing the rockets their first two chips ever
ewing was a career knick and they could have brought him back but chose not to and of course the knicks have never been noteworthy since either
pierce left for another situation, i wouldnt necessarliy say better, and still they should have paid him his legacy money and for bringing kg/ray to boston
Do you wipe your mouth when you're finished slurping or nah?
i mean you make it seem as if in any of these situations, keeping the player would have been more detrimental than letting them go. i mean none of them really did anything significant in the years after they cut/traded these superstars, so how would it have hurt to keep them and let them retire?