2011 College Football "The Real been hacked!!!!" .

[university of nike]

Originally Posted by CP1708

I think USC, Texas and Oklahoma are all that matter, the other 13 can just sit and count the money the big 3 will bring in. 

Tell me I'm wrong, go ahead......

39	Univ of Oregon (Football)	$29,505,906	$18,071,012	$11,434,894
40	Univ of Arizona (Football)	$24,398,253	$13,685,931	$10,712,322
41	Syracuse University (Basketball)	$18,309,470	$8,086,376	$10,223,094
42	Wisconsin (Basketball)	$17,666,311	$7,539,418	$10,126,893
43	Illinois (Basketball)	$14,413,222	$4,980,589	$9,432,633
44	Georgia Tech (Football)	$24,870,064	$15,519,206	$9,350,858
45	Indiana Univ. (Football)	$21,783,185	$12,822,779	$8,960,406
46	Indiana (Basketball)	$16,570,158	$7,653,945	$8,916,213
47	Univ. of Arkansas (Basketball)	$15,515,830	$6,839,213	$8,676,617
48	Univ of Southern California (Football)	$29,080,117	$20,820,468	$8,259,649

http://businessofcollegesports.com/...ketball-programs-produce-the-largest-profits/

You're wrong.

 

[university of nike]

Originally Posted by CP1708

I think USC, Texas and Oklahoma are all that matter, the other 13 can just sit and count the money the big 3 will bring in. 

Tell me I'm wrong, go ahead......

39	Univ of Oregon (Football)	$29,505,906	$18,071,012	$11,434,894
40	Univ of Arizona (Football)	$24,398,253	$13,685,931	$10,712,322
41	Syracuse University (Basketball)	$18,309,470	$8,086,376	$10,223,094
42	Wisconsin (Basketball)	$17,666,311	$7,539,418	$10,126,893
43	Illinois (Basketball)	$14,413,222	$4,980,589	$9,432,633
44	Georgia Tech (Football)	$24,870,064	$15,519,206	$9,350,858
45	Indiana Univ. (Football)	$21,783,185	$12,822,779	$8,960,406
46	Indiana (Basketball)	$16,570,158	$7,653,945	$8,916,213
47	Univ. of Arkansas (Basketball)	$15,515,830	$6,839,213	$8,676,617
48	Univ of Southern California (Football)	$29,080,117	$20,820,468	$8,259,649

http://businessofcollegesports.com/...ketball-programs-produce-the-largest-profits/

You're wrong.

 

[CP1708]

Originally Posted by dreClark

I assume Jacory must've outplayed Morris all spring/summer

Ok, I get that, so why would Golden say that he would give 3 practices this week for them to fight it out, and then a day later say it's Jacory, we're done? 

  Seems like Al can't decide or something.  

I see what you're sayin Nako, and that may be how it goes, blame Jacory and beg for Morris, but if Jacory wins, (earning more PT) we're really @#$%^& 

  
I thought Morris made 1 terrible throw vs Maryland, everything else he did was fine.  He missed Miller because of the hit he was about to take, he didn't throw to his TE at all, which is nuts given our usage of TE's over the years, he had no playmakers at WR at all, made me miss Hankerson all game long, I think he earned the right to start vs Ohio St given 2 more weeks to prepare for them with the first team offense.  Add in Benji comin back, maybe he could do somethin. 

Jacory better not lollipop hand offs to Miller, in fact, I hope he hands off 50 times. 

 

[CP1708]

Originally Posted by dreClark

I assume Jacory must've outplayed Morris all spring/summer

Ok, I get that, so why would Golden say that he would give 3 practices this week for them to fight it out, and then a day later say it's Jacory, we're done? 

  Seems like Al can't decide or something.  

I see what you're sayin Nako, and that may be how it goes, blame Jacory and beg for Morris, but if Jacory wins, (earning more PT) we're really @#$%^& 

  
I thought Morris made 1 terrible throw vs Maryland, everything else he did was fine.  He missed Miller because of the hit he was about to take, he didn't throw to his TE at all, which is nuts given our usage of TE's over the years, he had no playmakers at WR at all, made me miss Hankerson all game long, I think he earned the right to start vs Ohio St given 2 more weeks to prepare for them with the first team offense.  Add in Benji comin back, maybe he could do somethin. 

Jacory better not lollipop hand offs to Miller, in fact, I hope he hands off 50 times. 

 

[CP1708]

Originally Posted by University of Nike

Originally Posted by CP1708

I think USC, Texas and Oklahoma are all that matter, the other 13 can just sit and count the money the big 3 will bring in. 

Tell me I'm wrong, go ahead......

You're wrong.

No, I'm not. 

I don't give a @#$% about what numbers get entered into some spreadsheet.  Put USC, Tex, and OK in a division together, and the rest don't matter.  Period.  I don't care how many pennies get scrounged up elsewhere.  


Edit-
    

at Texas and Oklahoma being #1 and 10 on that list and you leaving them out. 

 

Once SC gets off sanctions and gets back to normal, those 3 are all that matter.  Don't fight it. 

 

[CP1708]

Originally Posted by University of Nike

Originally Posted by CP1708

I think USC, Texas and Oklahoma are all that matter, the other 13 can just sit and count the money the big 3 will bring in. 

Tell me I'm wrong, go ahead......

You're wrong.

No, I'm not. 

I don't give a @#$% about what numbers get entered into some spreadsheet.  Put USC, Tex, and OK in a division together, and the rest don't matter.  Period.  I don't care how many pennies get scrounged up elsewhere.  


Edit-
    

at Texas and Oklahoma being #1 and 10 on that list and you leaving them out. 

 

Once SC gets off sanctions and gets back to normal, those 3 are all that matter.  Don't fight it. 

 

[university of nike]

Whatever you think, and the amount of rolling smileys that you use, don't matter. You said that everyone else will sit around and "count the $$$" that the big 3 will bring in.

USC isn't a "big $$$" school. It has nothing to do with talent, or wins, or anything. Hell, Arizona basketball makes more money than USC football.

But I'll let you put your CP shades back on and go back into delusional mode now.

 

[university of nike]

Whatever you think, and the amount of rolling smileys that you use, don't matter. You said that everyone else will sit around and "count the $$$" that the big 3 will bring in.

USC isn't a "big $$$" school. It has nothing to do with talent, or wins, or anything. Hell, Arizona basketball makes more money than USC football.

But I'll let you put your CP shades back on and go back into delusional mode now.

 

[dr mantis toboggan]

Originally Posted by CP1708

Originally Posted by University of Nike

Originally Posted by CP1708

I think USC, Texas and Oklahoma are all that matter, the other 13 can just sit and count the money the big 3 will bring in. 

Tell me I'm wrong, go ahead......

You're wrong.

No, I'm not. 

I don't give a @#$% about what numbers get entered into some spreadsheet.  Put USC, Tex, and OK in a division together, and the rest don't matter.  Period.  I don't care how many pennies get scrounged up elsewhere.  


Edit-
    

at Texas and Oklahoma being #1 and 10 on that list and you leaving them out. 

 

Once SC gets off sanctions and gets back to normal, those 3 are all that matter.  Don't fight it. 

Texas 

 

[dr mantis toboggan]

Originally Posted by CP1708

Originally Posted by University of Nike

Originally Posted by CP1708

I think USC, Texas and Oklahoma are all that matter, the other 13 can just sit and count the money the big 3 will bring in. 

Tell me I'm wrong, go ahead......

You're wrong.

No, I'm not. 

I don't give a @#$% about what numbers get entered into some spreadsheet.  Put USC, Tex, and OK in a division together, and the rest don't matter.  Period.  I don't care how many pennies get scrounged up elsewhere.  


Edit-
    

at Texas and Oklahoma being #1 and 10 on that list and you leaving them out. 

 

Once SC gets off sanctions and gets back to normal, those 3 are all that matter.  Don't fight it. 

Texas 

 

[wraith aka invincible]

Originally Posted by dreClark

They don't have a QB on that roster? Psssssh, you must've never heard of Spencer Whipple.

 

[wraith aka invincible]

Originally Posted by dreClark

They don't have a QB on that roster? Psssssh, you must've never heard of Spencer Whipple.

 

[university of nike]

Originally Posted by Dr Mantis Toboggan

Texas 

2000/12/29  Oregon        35  -  Texas         30

 

[university of nike]

Originally Posted by Dr Mantis Toboggan

Texas 

2000/12/29  Oregon        35  -  Texas         30

 

[ThaxbyChamblis]

Jacory is only listed 1st because he comes 1st alphabetically? That's what some Cane fan said.

 

[mr marcus]

#PrayForJacory

 

[mr marcus]

#PrayForJacory

 

[nako xl]

Originally Posted by dreClark

Jacory is only listed 1st because he comes 1st alphabetically? That's what some Cane fan said.

 

[nako xl]

Originally Posted by dreClark

Jacory is only listed 1st because he comes 1st alphabetically? That's what some Cane fan said.

 

[ThaxbyChamblis]

Jacory is only listed 1st because he comes 1st alphabetically? That's what some Cane fan said.

 

[university of nike]

Uncanny.

 

[CP1708]

Originally Posted by University of Nike

Whatever you think, and the amount of rolling smileys that you use, don't matter. You said that everyone else will sit around and "count the $$$" that the big 3 will bring in.

USC isn't a "big $$$" school. It has nothing to do with talent, or wins, or anything. Hell, Arizona basketball makes more money than USC football.

But I'll let you put your CP shades back on and go back into delusional mode now.

Yes, in the future with 4 super conferences, the 3 marquee teams would be the ones generating the money.  As you love to say, what was before won't matter tomorrow.  SC don't make big money in the past, so be it, when they team up with Tex and OK, they will be the 3 big draws.  No one else will matter. 

Go ahead and try and sell me that a Pac 16 TV contract would draw heavily on "the others" in that conference. 

  You know damn well who they would be using to sell their product. 
  

 

[CP1708]

Originally Posted by University of Nike

Whatever you think, and the amount of rolling smileys that you use, don't matter. You said that everyone else will sit around and "count the $$$" that the big 3 will bring in.

USC isn't a "big $$$" school. It has nothing to do with talent, or wins, or anything. Hell, Arizona basketball makes more money than USC football.

But I'll let you put your CP shades back on and go back into delusional mode now.

Yes, in the future with 4 super conferences, the 3 marquee teams would be the ones generating the money.  As you love to say, what was before won't matter tomorrow.  SC don't make big money in the past, so be it, when they team up with Tex and OK, they will be the 3 big draws.  No one else will matter. 

Go ahead and try and sell me that a Pac 16 TV contract would draw heavily on "the others" in that conference. 

  You know damn well who they would be using to sell their product. 
  

 

[university of nike]

Uncanny.

 

[university of nike]

Originally Posted by CP1708

Go ahead and try and sell me that a Pac 16 TV contract would draw heavily on "the others" in that conference. 

  You know damn well who they would be using to sell their product.  

Arizona and UCLA basketball?
OSU baseball?
Stanford and Oregon football?
Oregon T&F?