jpzx
Supporter
- 58,170
- 27,703
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2008
Somehow numbers from 2003-2006 are relevant in who is better now? What?Originally Posted by Jehlers02
[table][tr][td]Season[/td][td]Team[/td][td]
[/td][td]Receiving[/td][td]Rushing[/td][td]Fumbles[/td][/tr][tr][td]G[/td][td]GS[/td][td]Rec[/td][td]Yds[/td][td]Avg[/td][td]Lng[/td][td]TD[/td][td]Att[/td][td]Yds[/td][td]Avg[/td][td]Lng[/td][td]TD[/td][td]FUM[/td][td]Lost[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2006 [/td][td] New York Giants [/td] [td] 16 [/td] [td] 4 [/td] [td]12[/td][td]81[/td][td]6.8[/td][td]16[/td][td]0[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]1[/td][td]1[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2005 [/td][td] New York Giants [/td] [td] 16 [/td] [td] 5 [/td] [td]8[/td][td]91[/td][td]11.4[/td][td]17[/td][td]0[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2004 [/td][td] New York Giants [/td] [td] 16 [/td] [td] 7 [/td] [td]5[/td][td]25[/td][td]5.0[/td][td]9[/td][td]1[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][/tr][tr][td] 2003 [/td][td] New York Giants [/td] [td] 16 [/td] [td] 7 [/td] [td]10[/td][td]56[/td][td]5.6[/td][td]10[/td][td]2[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][td]--[/td][/tr][/table]
I WILL NOT debate Finley and Shaincoe.
I guess you failed to mention (or didn't know) that during those four years he was playing behind Jeremy Shockey, who during those four years was regarded as a Top 5 tight end in the NFL.
Some of these Packer fans
When your TE puts up double digit TDs and produces for a full season... then we can talk about him on the same level as those who have done it... alright? Y'all love to crown your dudes before they've done anything. Somehow, Sidney Rice puts up great #s for one year and cannot be regarded as a Top 10 receiver because "he only did it for one year", but Jermichael Finley can, solely off hype, be called a "Top 5 TE by the end of the year" without doing jack $!%*? What's good with that?