JPZx wrote:
If you are one of the higher tier 2010 free agents getting set to test the waters in the off-season, which of these two groups of players interests you more?:
Timberwolves
-Al Jefferson (25 years old, 20 & 10 guy at full health)
-Kevin Love (21 years old)
-Jonny Flynn (21 years old)
-Corey Brewer (23 years old)
-Ricky Rubio (19 years old)
-Wayne Ellington (22 years old)
-Top 2-3 Pick in the 2010 NBA Draft
-TWO additional first round picks in the 2010 Draft owed to us by Charlotte and Utah.
Knicks
-David Lee (26 years old, 20 & 10 guy)
-Wilson Chandler (22 years old)
-Danilo Gallinari (21 years old)
-Nate Robinson (25 years old)
-Jordan Hill? (22 years old) (Cross him out if the Knicks complete the T-Mac trade)
-Toney Douglas? (23 years old)
-No First Round Pick in 2010
Now, before I go on, let me make it clear that I know that New York is the "Mecca" of basketball and you would be insane to choose Minnesota over New York if solely deciding between cities. I realize that I am fighting an uphill battle in saying that there is logic in choosing the Timberwolves over the Knicks this off-season. Ok, now that I got that out of the way...
1.) The Knicks are ranked #2 in terms of teams that have enough salary cap space to make a run at a big time free agent this off-season, and the Timberwolves are #4. A difference, yeah, but no much of a difference.
2.) Right now, I believe the New York Knicks only have enough space to sign one big time free agent. Therefore, Lebron or whoever signs there will have to play with the already established core you have there. However that could change if this Tracy McGrady trade goes through which would free up more cap space. As it stands though, a lot of teams are blowing smoke and many rumors are being shot back and forth without much credibility, so lets not consider that a factor until something concrete happens.
3.) New York winters aren't all that different from Minnesota winters. The average temperature/degrees are similar as well.
4.) Minneapolis is statistically a Top 10 market in the United States I believe...it's not Tumbleweed USA like Iowa, most of Wisconsin, and the Dakotas one bit.
5.) Looking at the rosters above and taking into account the probability of which pieces will still be there for the 2010-2011 season, I think you'd have to be inclined to say that the Timberwolves current personnel and the personnel that the free agent would be playing with is more attractive.
Now am I saying that all of these factors will play into one of the higher tier free agent's mind, causing him to choose the Timberwolves? No. And heck, after writing up this essay that I believe to be logical, stating reasons for why Minnesota would be a better situation to come in to than many other destinations....I can admit to you right now that I'd be overly shocked if one of the big free agents DOES sign here, electing to pass up other intriguing offers.
The logic's right in front of them, they just have to see it.
I see what you are saying, and agree or the most part, but it's pretty much the same if he looks at the Clippers and sees Blake, Gordon, Thorton, Jordan, and then Kaman, and Baron on the roster as well, and LA doesn't have the cold winters, and also has the media hype/Hollywood/attention one would want as a mega star. So regardless, there are teams out there that can make legit offers, it's just a matter of a guy wanting to join a perennial loser. (I don't mean any offense by that, I simply mean in terms of winning franchise and what not)