- 6,760
- 1,470
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2004
The difference is he bought a legal item in a manner which would not be considered fair or just by most, and most likely doesn't follow the company's policy.Originally Posted by TaylorSwiftOrDie
I like I posted earlier I TOTALLY UNDERSTAND WHY YOU CALLED THE EMPLOYEE OUT BECAUSE IT'S TRUE THAT IS FUKED UP but I think it's also wrong that bought a pair from him first and then turned him in ? It's like this........ Let's say you buy dope from a kid .......you take it smoke it get high and then go off and call the cops on him for selling you the hope that you smoked and got high on? Maybe I'm not making sense but it seams like that employee is doing what he's doing because he sees that people are buying the shoes outside the mall so your pretty much feeding into the monster ? By the way there's no beef in this argument because it's just a honest conversation that I want to understand
In the end, he did the right thing by buying his shoes. In the end, he got the extra money he paid back and the shoes. If he wouldn't have bought the shoes, he'd be Foamless and he also wouldn't have told corporate.