- 1,157
- 10
Joe Barry (SC LB coach) to the Bolts. Big loss damn.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally Posted by GUNNA GET IT
I Can't wait to see *BRAY THROW TO JHunt, Da'Rick, CordPat, Pig, Drae, & Croom
Originally Posted by ScarsOrScabs
Nice. We still have an easy road to the ACC Championship. I know that's kinda like bragging about !$#+%*% a blind fat girl but whatever.Originally Posted by dreClark
^ A half Oz of Loud?
Syracuse will be in the Atlantic division of the ACC (FSU, Clemson, Wake, NC State, Boston College, Maryland)
Pitt will be in the coastal division of the ACC (VT, UVA, Miami, UNC, Georgia Tech, Duke)
Originally Posted by firered18
Originally Posted by GUNNA GET IT
I Can't wait to see *BRAY THROW TO JHunt, Da'Rick, CordPat, Pig, Drae, & Croom
GO F*CKING VOLS!!!
It wouldn't be a National Signing Day without a potential NCAA violation by Lane Kiffin.
Around 8:30 a.m. on the USC campus, ESPN reporter Shelley Smith recounted a text message she had received from Kiffin about three hours earlier on the air, and possibly walked the Trojans right into a secondary recruiting violation.
"I got a text from Lane Kiffin at 5:15 this morning telling me to wake up, it was a big day and then I got a second text saying, 'We need to get Nelson,'" Smith said live on ESPNU. "Now, I'm not sure what last name because he didn't tell me that, there are a lot of Nelson's out there, but I'm going to guess that it's Nelson Agholor, a very highly talented athlete out of Tampa, Florida. He is expected to sign either with Florida or with USC in the next 45 minutes."
Here the thing: Coaches aren't allowed to talk about any recruit that hasn't signed a national letter of intent and as Smith noted herself, Nelson wasn't set to make his announcement until at least 45 later.
Whoops.
According to the NCAA:
Coaches can't talk about recruits before having a valid National Letter of Intent on file, and they can't attend NLI signings not on an institution's campus. Not allowing coaches to talk about the players they are recruiting avoids the "one-upmanship" that could (and previously did) occur between coaches in the recruiting process.
Sadly, this isn't the first time ESPN has had a hand in helping Kiffin into a secondary violation. During Kiffin's brief tenure at Tennessee, he allowed ESPN to do an "Outside The Lines" piece on him and that segment included a scene of Kiffin having a meeting with a couple of recruits, which was a violation because media is not allowed to observe a coach having contact with a recruit.
That was just one of 12 secondary violations Kiffin committed in a 10-month span in Knoxville, all of them linked to recruiting.
Until today, Kiffin had been unscathed during his tenure at USC.
While Smith was probably just trying to use her relationship with Kiffin to give some depth to her report, it definitely backfired. USC probably won't get more than a slap on the wrist for this, but perhaps Kiffin needs to be a little more careful about what he says.
at the people calling for more sanctions on usc because of this. college football fans are clowns.
In short, there’s a low correlation between recruiting rankings and success on offense (besides QB), but a high one between recruiting rankings and success on defense (in all defensive positions). Even the correlation for QB is lower than the correlation for any defensive group between recruiting and success. That makes sense, as you can coach up the O-Line, RB’s, QB’s, and even WR’s & then put them in a scheme that best utilizes their strengths without exposing their weaknesses (for instance, turning a lightly recruited and lowly ranked average-sized guy with average speed but good hands & who is fearless in to a great slot receiver), but defense is more about reacting, where sheer physical talent is very important, and it’s very hard to hide a weakness, as the opposing team would look to exploit it.
Originally Posted by DaComeUP
Originally Posted by Weaponry Expert
FSU & UF with a total of 2 recruits out of Dade & Broward. Golden locked that down. State of Miami is back.
If we based recruiting analyses on these suppositions, which schools really won recruiting? I know FSU would be one due to it's highly-rated D-line class. Who else?Originally Posted by HankMoody
http://mgoblog.com/diaries/what’s-5...cting-future-team-success-recruiting-rankings
Not from the article but a poster's summary:
In short, there’s a low correlation between recruiting rankings and success on offense (besides QB), but a high one between recruiting rankings and success on defense (in all defensive positions). Even the correlation for QB is lower than the correlation for any defensive group between recruiting and success. That makes sense, as you can coach up the O-Line, RB’s, QB’s, and even WR’s & then put them in a scheme that best utilizes their strengths without exposing their weaknesses (for instance, turning a lightly recruited and lowly ranked average-sized guy with average speed but good hands & who is fearless in to a great slot receiver), but defense is more about reacting, where sheer physical talent is very important, and it’s very hard to hide a weakness, as the opposing team would look to exploit it.
Originally Posted by GUNNA GET IT
did this pot head post a bleacher report link as if that was some informative expert analysis?
ASDCJKEOriginally Posted by GUNNA GET IT
did this pot head post a bleacher report link as if that was some informative expert analysis?