- Feb 15, 2012
- 16,421
- 2,164
They should've used the black GRs materials with this colorway and last year's shade of blue
Last edited:
🎾 OFFICIAL AGASSI RETRO THREAD 🎾
- Thread in 'Nike Retro' Thread starter Started by kb24strikesagain,
- Start date
- Nov 2, 2007
- 8,776
- 5,180
I have word we might be seeing the Atc 2s on Nike ID SOON.
As soon as I saw the trainer sc on id I said to myself the atc2 is next which would be really damaging to my wallet
- Nov 2, 2007
- 8,776
- 5,180
I think they'll be damaging to the shoes also, I like the fact there isn't a large array of colors. Maybe that's just nostalgia talking but I can see newbies making yeezy colorways and just ruining the shoe.
Last edited:
- Feb 27, 2013
- 1,720
- 333
i like the different textures, could eaisly see some 3M being incorparated as well.. will wait for official images to commit to the struggle of obtaining these if they're truly the USO2
- Jun 21, 2014
- 298
- 107
Was just thinking how cool it would be earlier today while designing my 5th SC trainer [emoji]128516[/emoji]
- Feb 20, 2013
- 1,791
- 511
I would make yeezy colorways in addition to an array of others.
- May 22, 2009
- 10,322
- 8,215
If these are the US Opens that just a disgrace, kumquats over this mystery cw anyday IMO
- Jun 21, 2014
- 298
- 107
If they are, although it might be underwhelming but still in all Nike hit what 5 "Grand Slams" with the previous releases. Caused a lot of hysteria even for those extremely familiar with the line. For that I give em a round if applause
- Jul 5, 2014
- 869
- 406
Those aren't the us open 2s those are a blue cw similar to the burgandy ones for fall. The uso2s are the all blacks from what I can tell.
View media item 1062848
View media item 1062848
- Aug 18, 2012
- 8,560
- 3,537
The Black/Navy pair is not the USO 2...
- Mar 1, 2007
- 7,138
- 6,238
- Feb 15, 2012
- 16,421
- 2,164
The all blacks look better so I'm thinking those are the USO 2s. On top of the fact that I dont know why that guy (checked his IG) would have the USOs so far in advance.
- Mar 4, 2013
- 4,109
- 3,235
Id pay GS pricing to ID a pair of ATC2 with GS quality
Just give me a gum sole option and Im in
- Jan 4, 2014
- 897
- 270
O
Doesn't Sneakerhead have a Nike account? Why do they always have to charge resell?
- Mar 1, 2007
- 7,138
- 6,238
overdoz
SH always has a markup on "popular" models. Or what they deem as popular. Their free shipping has no rhyme or reason too.
- Feb 15, 2012
- 16,421
- 2,164
When we saw the flights on ID I thought these would be next. The SC trainers were next so dropped it.
I have never tried IDing a pair so IDK what the hype is about. I made a few colorways way back when Nike ID first dropped but I didnt get much pleasure out of those basic colorways.
I have never tried IDing a pair so IDK what the hype is about. I made a few colorways way back when Nike ID first dropped but I didnt get much pleasure out of those basic colorways.
Last edited:
- Jul 5, 2014
- 869
- 406
They feed off beasts
- Jan 4, 2014
- 897
- 270
Oh I see, same as Shoe Palace.Â
- Mar 4, 2013
- 4,109
- 3,235
Color options have improved since back in the day but I never IDed a pair either lol couldnt justify the price hike.
Ive seen some nice IDs over the past few yrs that are better than nikes own cws
- Jul 5, 2014
- 869
- 406
iDing could dilute the history behind the shoe. But if if they throw in a glow in the dark sole for the beasts maybe they'll stay off those us open 2s and the Australian 2s and spend their bread on wannabeezys.
- May 30, 2014
- 89
- 120
...........
Last edited:
- Aug 4, 2005
- 35,032
- 16,945
I don't know about y'all but the USO are fire. Very subtle yet pops. I'll give them a go
- Mar 4, 2013
- 4,109
- 3,235
Dilute? History is history bro lol. The shoe is what it is.
IMO I dont think there is a aus2 I think the ones released already are apart of this GS. If you noticed they didnt have the nike tounge tag like last yrs uso or wimbs did and they didnt have nike air on the heel either.
But again just me looking at previous releases.
- May 30, 2014
- 89
- 120
.......
Last edited:
