- Jul 10, 2015
- 33,543
- 27,237
There’s no consistent answer on this team when it comes to defending Randle. He just goes through Collins like a traffic cone when he’s on him
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Was a great game both ways. Had me about to punch through a wall a few times.There’s no consistent answer on this team when it comes to defending Randle. He just goes through Collins like a traffic cone when he’s on him
My Knicks . Julius Randle for MIP.Hey y’all. Knicks. 8 in a row. Y’all have a blessed night ya hear me!
Hmm, not bad for a detrimental loser player
Is this something that really required damage control?
Hmm, not bad for a detrimental loser player
I mean, who they are playing is somewhat relevant but clutch time is the considered the last 5 minutes of a game within 5 points. What is his record in the games where he accumulated these stats? It very well could be a winning record but I don’t know with the manner in which it has been presented.But WHO was he playing those clutch minutes against is the question? Was Bradley Beal hot those games?
Have to burn 33 Porzingis minutes against a team whose only big is Mason Plumlee so now he’s probably out tomorrow.Knicks about to win a playoff series and get a lottery pick.
What a time to be alive
Juju being one of the 15 best players in the NBA this season is incredible
But this goes back to my earlier point about how these owners don't really care about these sports teams. Unless its an easy move to bolster profitability (and the teams you named don't really need it) why would they bother going through this and giving up a piece of their pie?This is funny because we touched on some of this last week when the D-Wade news broke (curious about his stake, him just being a figurehead, Hov’s paltry stake but fooling everyone, etc). I guess I see the author’s point but what exactly is he advocating for? People to get to know more about owners of teams they don’t care about? Okay, then what...boycott their companies? Try to take down their businesses? Get Silver to force them to sell? Create some Ethics Board to screen owners?
And even if you want to say they are “using” the players, celebrities not only make money directly from their involvement but the article even touches on other auxiliary benefits as well. I’m not defending any of these scumbag owners, I just don’t know what the realistic expectation is if there was heightened awareness of how they obtained their billions.
Relevant:
So I was watching First Take and yes, it is apparently something that required damage control so Arison was smart to get ahead of it. Stephen A and Spike Lee were talking about how it’s a travesty that Shaq played for Orlando/LA/Miami (won chips with the last two) and Wade is Heat GOAT but they both had to go to other franchises in order to get an ownership stake. Apparently there is a belief that these legendary, franchise cornerstone players should have a right to own a piece of those teams if want to go that route.
Not my take, just sharing what I heard and providing an explanation to Micky’s tweet.
Knicks about to win a playoff series and get a lottery pick.
What a time to be alive
His game is way more under control and developed now.
I’m in wholehearted agreement with you and to your point that you made in a post that same idiot concerning Elon and Jay perpetually fooling folks - people are idiots. There are probably plenty of people out there who think like SAS and Spike in this scenario and believe those teams did Shaq and D. Wade wrong. Micky was just getting ahead of the narrative.But this goes back to my earlier point about how these owners don't really care about these sports teams. Unless its an easy move to bolster profitability (and the teams you named don't really need it) why would they bother going through this and giving up a piece of their pie?
The Jazz need an image overhaul bad so it makes sense.
That’s really the biggest thing to me with his development - the added control.
He was an offensive foul or turnover waiting to happen before. But he’s slowed things down and seems to have a much better sense of how to get where he wants without bowling people over.
I think the back half of your post was satire but the first half is 100% true. He was awful. He was a three-point heaving version of typical Washedbrook tonight on the offensive end with all of the misses and sloppy turnovers. The gravity was definitely there but he had so many errant turnovers. His heaves at the end when he was ice cold missed badly too. He was bound to come back down to earth eventually but he didn’t look him himself at all out there.Steph was terrible tonight, need a much better showing to drag this team into the playoffs