omg those are TERRIBLE
1) They're not 'ugly to begin with', I think it's weird that you look at it that way
2) Even if they're ugly, is that an excuse to buy colorways you don't even like? I agree with @LBJ23DAKING, we shouldn't be supporting Nike by buying these horrible releases.
Remember when I posted a while back that the Black/Red 1s are Retroing too?
Guess what: I've heard that they are this year's Black Friday release. Makes sense in a way, we have been getting Black/Red kicks for the past two years now
Exactly. Retros don't look like the OGs (even though I hope and think they will some day) but that does not necessarily mean that they are always ugly, right? I think the shape of the 2013 Grapes is on point too. Much better than the 2006 imo. Even though the materials do not seem to be getting...
This. A lot of people keep hyping up the Nike Air logo on the back and sure, it looks much nicer than the Jumpman logo but I think the shape is more important. However, most pics (not all) that I've seen of the 2013 WC III have a pretty good shape so I think this will be a pretty good Retro...
Yeah it's pretty understandable. Why not sell them for more if people will buy them anyway?
Off-topic: Why can't I chain-quote? Like have a quote in a quote
http://www.soleawesome.com/air-jordan-iii-3-88-nike-air-retro-2013-580775-160/
I saw them here. Now they're $300. They were $270 two days ago. Looks like prices are going up very quickly...