Search results

From another forum: There are two interpretations of the equation: 1. That the multiplication of 2(9+3) carries precedence over the 48 being against the bracket (answer is 2) and 2. That the true function before the bracket is 48/2 (answer is 288) Which is correct? This is apparently a...

From another forum: There are two interpretations of the equation: 1. That the multiplication of 2(9+3) carries precedence over the 48 being against the bracket (answer is 2) and 2. That the true function before the bracket is 48/2 (answer is 288) Which is correct? This is apparently a...

Ok, like your boy said earlier.  wolframalpha is a Ferrari and myalgebra is a corolla.   You know what happens when you drive a Ferrari too slow? It %$!*! up the engine  I feel like I've been the most reasonable person for both sides.  There is a difference between the signs. No one can answer...

Ok, like your boy said earlier.  wolframalpha is a Ferrari and myalgebra is a corolla.   You know what happens when you drive a Ferrari too slow? It %$!*! up the engine  I feel like I've been the most reasonable person for both sides.  There is a difference between the signs. No one can answer...

You didn't answer my question about why the equation is written the way it is everywhere it's debated.   Do you think it's easy to find the og division symbol on a keyboard? I don't.  Why does everyone starting a thread in every forum have the og outdated division symbol? wouldn't it be easier...

You didn't answer my question about why the equation is written the way it is everywhere it's debated.   Do you think it's easy to find the og division symbol on a keyboard? I don't.  Why does everyone starting a thread in every forum have the og outdated division symbol? wouldn't it be easier...

You still didn't answer my question.  It's written that way for a reason....  oh and... U mad doggy. 

You still didn't answer my question.  It's written that way for a reason....  oh and... U mad doggy. 

 Ok doggy.  Good night sweet prince.  I noticed how you stopped with the caps  When you wake up answer my question about why it's written out the way it is (with og division symbol instead of /).

 Ok doggy.  Good night sweet prince.  I noticed how you stopped with the caps  When you wake up answer my question about why it's written out the way it is (with og division symbol instead of /).

I do not trust the german site and it's feasible that any math software would use both signs interchangeably which is incorrect.  Unfortunately the og division symbol is so old and played out it has little relevance today, until some trolling genius came up with this poorly written 'simple'...

I do not trust the german site and it's feasible that any math software would use both signs interchangeably which is incorrect.  Unfortunately the og division symbol is so old and played out it has little relevance today, until some trolling genius came up with this poorly written 'simple'...

NO ONE CAN DEFEND MYALGEBRA.COM ANYONE GETTING HEATED OVER THIS IS LOSING AT LIFE I DON'T EVEN KNOW WHY I'M TYPING IN CAPS Team2 btw 

NO ONE CAN DEFEND MYALGEBRA.COM ANYONE GETTING HEATED OVER THIS IS LOSING AT LIFE I DON'T EVEN KNOW WHY I'M TYPING IN CAPS Team2 btw 

Ok guys, on every forum it's written 48÷2(9+3) and not 48/2(9+3) for a reason...  ÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷ not ////////// myalgebra.com has boss software compared to your lowly german sites 

Ok guys, on every forum it's written 48÷2(9+3) and not 48/2(9+3) for a reason...  ÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷÷ not ////////// myalgebra.com has boss software compared to your lowly german sites 

its a tricky problem due to the way its written but its still written as 48 divided by 2 TIMES (9+3) even wolfram and every calculator gives you 288 if it gives you 2 your !%! is old and outdated go cawp the new edition THE PROBLEM IS NOT WRITTEN AS (2(9+3) so you cannot deny the correct...

its a tricky problem due to the way its written but its still written as 48 divided by 2 TIMES (9+3) even wolfram and every calculator gives you 288 if it gives you 2 your !%! is old and outdated go cawp the new edition THE PROBLEM IS NOT WRITTEN AS (2(9+3) so you cannot deny the correct...