i would be cautious of these...it seems that "nipple" on the back was cut off on both shoes. That "nipple" has been a common indicator of being fake for the 2012/13 1s
The 174 has the rounded legs so that looks good. Many legit pairs have a factory stamp on the underside of the box lid too but if it doesn't it may not necessarily mean that they're not real. I'm just more convinced if they they do have it
If these are the 2012 retros make sure they say "TWENTY TWELVE" on inner side of the tongue. IF they're legit, it'll have that but they look good to me but u never know... The dots on the underside of the lace wing looks good...a couple of other things that help give me more confidence that they...
This seller has these pics with a lace bag on both shoes, one is untied and the other seems to be factory laced. I'm not sure if he's trying to sell a fake pair with another pic of authentics. What do u think?
I purchased this pair from a Nike Outlet release earlier this summer. I've heard the outlet shoes can sometimes be "B" grades but I couldn't turn down a chance to get these for $120.
How do u feel these compare to other retail pairs? does the marking on the tag imply that these are "B" grades?