Search results

Thanks for your input! Is the reasoning the items I listed? I'd like to know for future purposes.

Here is another pair I found. Pls lemme know what you think. The things I'm worried about are the following: -Font on back of tongue looks a little bolder than my brothers 100% legit pair -stitching on the back of tongue (not sure of this one tho) -the insole in one of the pictures looks a...

Thanks for looking out guys.  I ended up passing on both of them.

Still haven't gotten those extra pics, but I found these other ones with horrible lighting pics.  I know you usually stay away, but the seller has 400+ feedback (100%) and has this for his description: UP FOR AUCTION IS A VERY LIMITED 100 % AUTHENTIC PAIR OF ICONIC RETRO 4 BRED SIZE 10 FROM MY...

Yea, I figured that was the case. I'll message and try and get those from him.  Right on... 

Y'all were so helpful on my WC 4 purchase (much appreciated). Thinking about making an offer on these.  Just wanted to make sure they look good.  These were the only pics on the listing... i know they're not the greatest.  Are they good enough to tell though?

No stamp on the box at all... but ryanjumpman420 had mentioned that while most boxes do have the stamp, some of them don't.  Thanks for your help though!

Thanks guys... I think I'm pretty much done with dealing with Craigslist and other sites with no buyer protection lol... 

Right on bro! I also heard from the seller and he said he put that silica pack in there to keep it fresh. Love these kicks!

Dang... Thanks for your input bro. Do you think it might just be a mass production QA kind of deal? Would fakes have real carbon fiber so soon? I know the 2011 concord fakes have gotten pretty close to looking like the authentics

Thank you sir!

Here are the rest of the pics. I really hope these are legit, b/c they're not then these are the best quality reps ever lol... Seller also included the receipt from Nike Town SF purchased for $173.60 with tax on 2/18/2012. Only thing odd is the silica pack gel.  Not sure if he put that in...

Bump for this last question regarding the jumpman tag. 

Quick question... if the stamp is not inside the box for these concord lows, does that mean unauthentic?  Do all retailers boxes have that stamp?

The reason I decided to proceed was because I heard Paypal protects the buyer. For what it's worth, I found the seller thru his eBay listing for this exact pair. He has a few hundred feedback all 100% and no negative feedback whatsoever. That, plus the few positive replys here, and paypal's...

Thanks guys! I pulled the trigger last night via invoiced Paypal. Seller is shipping them to me 1-day priority shipping so I'll have them Wednesday. I will post a pic of the TWENTY TWELVE tongue shot as soon as I receive them.

Right on brotha!  Much appreciated

Let's try this again lol... as usual, no disrespect to owner. Am I protected as a buyer if we go through Paypal invoice and he puts 100% authentic in the description (or something to that effect)? Anyways, here are the pictures... Thanks in advance!

Hey thanks for the feedback everyone... I agree that the pics are lacking a lot of detail, but I'm not an expert on 4s so I was hoping that someone would be able to spot some easy tells.  I suppose the fact they keeps sending me these filtered pics should raise some warning flags...  As for the...

Again, I mean no disrespect to the owner... I've been burned badly so I'm just trying to be extra careful! The seller has advertised the Bred 4 as VNDS and the WC 4 as PADS.. both "worn once or twice at most". Breds missing toe inserts and the WC are missing the paper (rest is OG all). $400...