- 160,397
- 141,986
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2001
Just a spinoff to the Kat Stacks situation. People say that dude shouldn't have smacked her, but then they go on to say they should have gotten a female to do it. 9/10 that female would have been a man-type female. Either way, someone that overpowers Katt Stacks would be striking her.
The world says men shouldn't hit women, but then they want men to look at women as their equal. Yea. If they are our equals, why shouldn't we be allowed to hit them and why should we give up our seats to them and open doors for them (off topic I know). It is just confusing (not for ME per-say but I can see how a stupid dude would be).
As I said, I don't condone violence and I don't think anyone should be putting their hands on anyone else. but I understand it. I don't see how hitting a woman is any different than a man hitting another man that is clearly not on his physical level.
So besides it being something we were taught as kids, why shouldn't men hit women again?
The world says men shouldn't hit women, but then they want men to look at women as their equal. Yea. If they are our equals, why shouldn't we be allowed to hit them and why should we give up our seats to them and open doors for them (off topic I know). It is just confusing (not for ME per-say but I can see how a stupid dude would be).
As I said, I don't condone violence and I don't think anyone should be putting their hands on anyone else. but I understand it. I don't see how hitting a woman is any different than a man hitting another man that is clearly not on his physical level.
So besides it being something we were taught as kids, why shouldn't men hit women again?