- 341
- 10
- Joined
- May 2, 2010
not mine but pretty sick.
Lock if this has been posted
Lock if this has been posted
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by Brandon3000
I'm tired of this debate....
and the kobe one...
let it go
lebron is not MJ
he's lebron
when his career is done then lets look
love scottie but wish he woulda shut his mouth
Originally Posted by Brandon3000
I'm tired of this debate....
and the kobe one...
let it go
lebron is not MJ
he's lebron
when his career is done then lets look
love scottie but wish he woulda shut his mouth
Originally Posted by OnionSlice
From a legacy standpoint, there's no competition at all. As just a pure performance standpoint, it's not completely outlandish or anything. It's still Jordan, but it's not ridiculous or anything.
I think of it like this. Right now LeBron is like '91 MJ. MJ was in his prime in the '91 playoffs and on his way to winning his first championship. He didn't have a ring yet, but he was at his best. Would anyone argue that '96 MJ was better than '91 MJ? He had the rings, the finals MVPs, the epic finals performances, but he wasn't a better player than '91 MJ.
Look at Kobe. He won his last 2 rings past his prime era. Would anybody argue that 2010 5 ring was better than 2005 3 ring Kobe?
I think LeBron will be at his absolute peak around 2012-2013. He may achieve more championships and MVP awards after that, but it won't mean that that is when he is at his best.
You can argue that MJ solidified his legacy with his 6th championship, but MJ winning rings #4, #5 & #6 was not the greatest player of all time. The MJ of the first 3-peat was the G.O.A.T.
Originally Posted by OnionSlice
From a legacy standpoint, there's no competition at all. As just a pure performance standpoint, it's not completely outlandish or anything. It's still Jordan, but it's not ridiculous or anything.
I think of it like this. Right now LeBron is like '91 MJ. MJ was in his prime in the '91 playoffs and on his way to winning his first championship. He didn't have a ring yet, but he was at his best. Would anyone argue that '96 MJ was better than '91 MJ? He had the rings, the finals MVPs, the epic finals performances, but he wasn't a better player than '91 MJ.
Look at Kobe. He won his last 2 rings past his prime era. Would anybody argue that 2010 5 ring was better than 2005 3 ring Kobe?
I think LeBron will be at his absolute peak around 2012-2013. He may achieve more championships and MVP awards after that, but it won't mean that that is when he is at his best.
You can argue that MJ solidified his legacy with his 6th championship, but MJ winning rings #4, #5 & #6 was not the greatest player of all time. The MJ of the first 3-peat was the G.O.A.T.
exactly. not trying to start a debate, i just enjoyed the vidOriginally Posted by 6dollaBURGER
Don't want to argue. Dope vid.
exactly. not trying to start a debate, i just enjoyed the vidOriginally Posted by 6dollaBURGER
Don't want to argue. Dope vid.