- 2,213
- 16
- Joined
- May 2, 2006
i was talkin about this with my friend, and i said the current format is kinda unfair to the team with home court advantage, because of the 3 games in the middle. I understand the change because of travel, but i think it makes the hme court advantage irrelevant.
this is my proposal... 3-3-1
I think this is the most fair to the home court team because, you get 3 home games in a row... the possibility of going up 3-0 before going on the road, is what should be home court advantage IMO... going on the road with a 2-0 lead and possibly coming back hom down 3-2, for games 6 or 7... that doesnt seem fair. I also feel it would be just as easy on traveling if not better.
i think the only disadvantage of this format would be possibility of alot of sweeps. but at the point of the NBA finals, the two teams should be able to handle the pressure of road games. what do you guys think?
this is my proposal... 3-3-1
I think this is the most fair to the home court team because, you get 3 home games in a row... the possibility of going up 3-0 before going on the road, is what should be home court advantage IMO... going on the road with a 2-0 lead and possibly coming back hom down 3-2, for games 6 or 7... that doesnt seem fair. I also feel it would be just as easy on traveling if not better.
i think the only disadvantage of this format would be possibility of alot of sweeps. but at the point of the NBA finals, the two teams should be able to handle the pressure of road games. what do you guys think?