- Dec 28, 2005
- 615
- 10
Those that say that...why aren't you scooping the plethora of 2 tone 6.0s, GRs, even quickstrikes, that fit that description, or just plain old IDingthem???
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally Posted by AAclaire420
I had those splatters for you bootleg ed but you never came through so I ended up selling them
Originally Posted by bootleg ed
Those that say that...why aren't you scooping the plethora of 2 tone 6.0s, GRs, even quickstrikes, that fit that description, or just plain old IDing them???
Originally Posted by iNiNe5
Originally Posted by bootleg ed
Those that say that...why aren't you scooping the plethora of 2 tone 6.0s, GRs, even quickstrikes, that fit that description, or just plain old IDing them???
regarding iD, the quality (bad to begin with) went way down during the same color palette. at the end of 2006, they put them up for the first time and had them for $100. I bought some. and then i bought some more in january for the same $100. And i noticed the quality of the "leather" went from bad to horrible. i mean the pair i bought in january had the "Wet-cardboard" type toe-box whereas the ones from december had stiffer toe-boxes. now, they price them at $110 and i bet the quality is just as bad or even worse. not worth spending money on.
You just answered your own question. Poor quality and wack colorways, plain and simple. I'm not going to front and say Niketalkers don't likerare sneakers (including myself sometimes), but it's not that complex in this case. Nike has been putting out trash. Also, why would I want a lameimitation of Grods for example, when I can still find Grods from '99?Originally Posted by bootleg ed
Originally Posted by iNiNe5
Originally Posted by bootleg ed
Those that say that...why aren't you scooping the plethora of 2 tone 6.0s, GRs, even quickstrikes, that fit that description, or just plain old IDing them???
regarding iD, the quality (bad to begin with) went way down during the same color palette. at the end of 2006, they put them up for the first time and had them for $100. I bought some. and then i bought some more in january for the same $100. And i noticed the quality of the "leather" went from bad to horrible. i mean the pair i bought in january had the "Wet-cardboard" type toe-box whereas the ones from december had stiffer toe-boxes. now, they price them at $110 and i bet the quality is just as bad or even worse. not worth spending money on.
I can't front the IDs i made were SUPER DUPER weak quality and ran huge....but still my point remains.
Originally Posted by jvhoop22
You just answered your own question. Poor quality and wack colorways, plain and simple. I'm not going to front and say Niketalkers don't like rare sneakers (including myself sometimes), but it's not that complex in this case. Nike has been putting out trash. Also, why would I want a lame imitation of Grods for example, when I can still find Grods from '99?Originally Posted by bootleg ed
Originally Posted by iNiNe5
Originally Posted by bootleg ed
Those that say that...why aren't you scooping the plethora of 2 tone 6.0s, GRs, even quickstrikes, that fit that description, or just plain old IDing them???
regarding iD, the quality (bad to begin with) went way down during the same color palette. at the end of 2006, they put them up for the first time and had them for $100. I bought some. and then i bought some more in january for the same $100. And i noticed the quality of the "leather" went from bad to horrible. i mean the pair i bought in january had the "Wet-cardboard" type toe-box whereas the ones from december had stiffer toe-boxes. now, they price them at $110 and i bet the quality is just as bad or even worse. not worth spending money on.
I can't front the IDs i made were SUPER DUPER weak quality and ran huge....but still my point remains.
Originally Posted by DUNKINLO
The diamond dunk is the most hyped up shoe in history of shoes