- May 23, 2005
- 63,609
- 50,740
That solar charger
Just when u think apple lost its mojo
They come through with that haymaker
Just when u think apple lost its mojo
They come through with that haymaker
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm sure the apple haters will find a way to criticize the solar charger very soon.
GOD DAMNI'm sure the apple haters will find a way to criticize the solar charger very soon.
Solar technology is still very inefficient, and with as small of a surface area as 2.5" x 5.5" (based on leaked specs, and assuming the solar panel covers the entire surface), it's gonna be a while for that battery bar to move anywhere. You guys sure you want to keep your phone baking in the sun?
Oh, you're going to be indoors with fluorescent light? Yea well solar panels are powered best by the higher energy UV which isn't used for indoor lighting.
How much is Apple going to charge for it? $150?
Might be useful for emergency situations, but on your regular run-of-the-mill day? Nah.
I can't effin wait b.
GOD DAMNI'm sure the apple haters will find a way to criticize the solar charger very soon.
Solar technology is still very inefficient, and with as small of a surface area as 2.5" x 5.5" (based on leaked specs, and assuming the solar panel covers the entire surface), it's gonna be a while for that battery bar to move anywhere. You guys sure you want to keep your phone baking in the sun?
Oh, you're going to be indoors with fluorescent light? Yea well solar panels are powered best by the higher energy UV which isn't used for indoor lighting.
How much is Apple going to charge for it? $150?
Might be useful for emergency situations, but on your regular run-of-the-mill day? Nah.
take yo hatin *** that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> way
GOD DAMNI'm sure the apple haters will find a way to criticize the solar charger very soon.
Solar technology is still very inefficient, and with as small of a surface area as 2.5" x 5.5" (based on leaked specs, and assuming the solar panel covers the entire surface), it's gonna be a while for that battery bar to move anywhere. You guys sure you want to keep your phone baking in the sun?
Oh, you're going to be indoors with fluorescent light? Yea well solar panels are powered best by the higher energy UV which isn't used for indoor lighting.
How much is Apple going to charge for it? $150?
Might be useful for emergency situations, but on your regular run-of-the-mill day? Nah.
take yo hatin *** that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> way
Basically. Dude is acting like he has the inside scoopandhas a doctorate in solar charging iPhone cases. His statement may stand true for previous products but none of us know exactly what Apple has up their sleeve.
Damn can some of us be sheep in peaceGOD DAMNI'm sure the apple haters will find a way to criticize the solar charger very soon.
Solar technology is still very inefficient, and with as small of a surface area as 2.5" x 5.5" (based on leaked specs, and assuming the solar panel covers the entire surface), it's gonna be a while for that battery bar to move anywhere. You guys sure you want to keep your phone baking in the sun?
Oh, you're going to be indoors with fluorescent light? Yea well solar panels are powered best by the higher energy UV which isn't used for indoor lighting.
How much is Apple going to charge for it? $150?
Might be useful for emergency situations, but on your regular run-of-the-mill day? Nah.
take yo hatin *** that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> way
Basically. Dude is acting like he has the inside scoopandhas a doctorate in solar charging iPhone cases. His statement may stand true for previous products but none of us know exactly what Apple has up their sleeve.
Right. And Apple is the authority when it comes to all forms of technology, solar included. I like Apple products a lot, but some of you guys need to stop putting them on a pedestal. If they had some groundbreaking technology involving harvesting solar energy, they wouldn't be wasting their time developing a goddamn phone case with it.
The delusion of some of you people is unbelievable. Like what gamble said above, you don't need insider information or a doctorate to know/understand what I posted. A weensy bit of a science education and a smidge of logic is about all you need.
I think September 15when they anouncing this?
Damn can some of us be sheep in peaceGOD DAMNI'm sure the apple haters will find a way to criticize the solar charger very soon.
Solar technology is still very inefficient, and with as small of a surface area as 2.5" x 5.5" (based on leaked specs, and assuming the solar panel covers the entire surface), it's gonna be a while for that battery bar to move anywhere. You guys sure you want to keep your phone baking in the sun?
Oh, you're going to be indoors with fluorescent light? Yea well solar panels are powered best by the higher energy UV which isn't used for indoor lighting.
How much is Apple going to charge for it? $150?
Might be useful for emergency situations, but on your regular run-of-the-mill day? Nah.
take yo hatin *** that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> way
Basically. Dude is acting like he has the inside scoopandhas a doctorate in solar charging iPhone cases. His statement may stand true for previous products but none of us know exactly what Apple has up their sleeve.
Right. And Apple is the authority when it comes to all forms of technology, solar included. I like Apple products a lot, but some of you guys need to stop putting them on a pedestal. If they had some groundbreaking technology involving harvesting solar energy, they wouldn't be wasting their time developing a goddamn phone case with it.
The delusion of some of you people is unbelievable. Like what gamble said above, you don't need insider information or a doctorate to know/understand what I posted. A weensy bit of a science education and a smidge of logic is about all you need.
We know all that already
Just let us enjoy what we like without all the criticism
dont know if posted but iphone 6, the 4.7 version will be displayed and announced sept 15, with a early release of ios 8, the phone will be released sept 25, at supposably $695 for the 32gb and $795 for the 64gb
Solar charger will be so clutch.
with optimal conditions a solar charger is pretty much on par with the same efficiency rate as a wall charger (again thats with perfect conditions). If not it might take 8-10 hrs to get a full charge.... Obviously optimal charging situations wouldnt be the norm, but when you factor in the fact most wouldnt need a complete full charging, the lighting and location.... if you could get something like a 20-30% boost in charging in a average day regular..just day to day it would be beneficial.Solar technology is still very inefficient, and with as small of a surface area as 2.5" x 5.5" (based on leaked specs, and assuming the solar panel covers the entire surface), it's gonna be a while for that battery bar to move anywhere. You guys sure you want to keep your phone baking in the sun?
Oh, you're going to be indoors with fluorescent light? Yea well solar panels are powered best by the higher energy UV which isn't used for indoor lighting.
How much is Apple going to charge for it? $150?
Might be useful for emergency situations, but on your regular run-of-the-mill day? Nah.
I'm in the same boat, I would do whatever it takes to keep that unlimited plan. I have my sister on my account and she struggles every month to stay within her allowance. Meanwhile I'm using 3gb comfortably streaming hella music.Ouch...my contract with VZW has been up for years, was planning to pay retail for the 6 to keep my unlimited data plan but damn.
I'm in the same boat, I would do whatever it takes to keep that unlimited plan. I have my sister on my account and she struggles every month to stay within her allowance. Meanwhile I'm using 3gb comfortably streaming hella music.