quise2024
Banned
- Feb 16, 2013
- 20,741
- 4,690
UA CURRY 2 & 2.5
- Thread in 'Other Brands' Thread starter Started by quise2024,
- Start date
quise2024
Banned
- Feb 16, 2013
- 20,741
- 4,690
- Aug 12, 2015
- 89
- 14
im liking the USA CW
quise2024
Banned
- Feb 16, 2013
- 20,741
- 4,690
- Apr 20, 2013
- 4,536
- 2,074
Usa is beautiful. That mango or whatever they're going to call it, not so much
- Jun 17, 2006
- 44,214
- 2,544
They look the same as the 1's.
TheGodFresco
formerly gsdoubleu
- Aug 31, 2007
- 24,478
- 2,308
USA LOOKS great
- Jan 28, 2013
- 1,937
- 2,946
I really like UA, but I feel like each shoe is becoming an extension of the original (CFD, SC1, etc.)
I wish they would come up with somewhat of a different design for new models instead of having them be just minimal tweaks on old successful models. Maybe they could just apply this to the SC line and not even the CFD line
I wish they would come up with somewhat of a different design for new models instead of having them be just minimal tweaks on old successful models. Maybe they could just apply this to the SC line and not even the CFD line
- Jul 27, 2015
- 264
- 76
Love the commercial. Shoes look like the 1s though. Might as well keep the 1s.
- Dec 26, 2011
- 928
- 1,081
- Jan 30, 2002
- 43,570
- 27,879
They look nice on feet too.
- Jun 1, 2015
- 16,532
- 4,206
That's my issue with the 2. UA hit a home run last year with Curry. The MVP, Title and his Curry 1 sneaker looked good and took off. He's the one guy I think could separate himself sneaker wise from the non Nike pac and have a legacy that rivals Penny, Pippen, Chuck.
Why did UA choose to make a shoe that's so similar looking to the 1? Sigs have a history of building off the previous years model and tech but these come off as a Elite version instead of the next in line. Not a bad looking shoe but a odd choice IMO.
- Jun 13, 2013
- 438
- 189
Curry 2 Low mockup
- Aug 23, 2015
- 315
- 122
On the back of the USAs it looks like there is tape covering up some of the detail. It looks like its got speckling underneath it. Or am I crazy?
- Jan 13, 2009
- 978
- 735
Maybe one thing with Curry is that with the way his ankles are, he needs specific type of fit, stability, and cut, hence the limitation on the overall design of his shoes.
But yeah these look quite generic, and please do something besides “SC” .
But yeah these look quite generic, and please do something besides “SC” .
- Aug 13, 2012
- 1,891
- 1,025
I really don't see how they look like the Curry 1. Outsole and midsole completely different
- Jul 27, 2015
- 264
- 76
Picture the Jordan 1 vs the Jordan 2. Shaq 1 vs. Shaq 2. Etc. These look like they took the same upper and molded the missile differently. Eve the UA symbol on the side is the same.
- Mar 16, 2008
- 17,790
- 834
black pair far left
View media item 1687488
red pair??
View media item 1687490
lookin forward to this pair...curry 1 was my fav sneaker this year
View media item 1687488
red pair??
View media item 1687490
lookin forward to this pair...curry 1 was my fav sneaker this year
- Jan 30, 2002
- 43,570
- 27,879
He wore the black pair couple months ago. I rather have the BHM Curry 1 instead.
Red pair is nice with gold touch.
Red pair is nice with gold touch.
- Mar 16, 2008
- 17,790
- 834
reds def my fav so far
the john wall 2 and curry 2 look great, wonder what the kyries look like
the john wall 2 and curry 2 look great, wonder what the kyries look like
- Jun 27, 2013
- 1,726
- 555
I'm on this boat. It's all a matter of opinion of course, but my take is the only things that look similar are the silhouette and the lace loops, and I guess the UA logo placement.
No toe guard from what I can tell, tongue looks different and it actually matches the rest of the upper on the 2, obviously outsole got changed up, heel counter is different, upper is way different, outsole looks segmented from heel to forefoot, no mesh tab at the achilles like the Curry 1. I see more differences than similarities.
- Jan 30, 2002
- 43,570
- 27,879
- Apr 20, 2013
- 4,536
- 2,074
Looks like a WOW 3/4 in the mid sole. Not really feeling as much as the 1.
- Jan 30, 2002
- 43,570
- 27,879
Not sure how accurate these dates are but the other shoes in the link has the correct RD for the corresponding shoes. 
View media item 1689464http://www.basket4ballers.com/content/21-calendrier-des-sorties-release-date
August 30:
Under Armour Curry 2 1259007-035
September 6:
Under Armour Curry 2 "Black" 1259007-003
Under Armour Curry 2 "Warriors" 1259007-422
October 4:
Under Armour Curry 2 "Black" 1259007-004
November 6:
Under Armour Curry 2 1259007-008
View media item 1689464http://www.basket4ballers.com/content/21-calendrier-des-sorties-release-date
August 30:
Under Armour Curry 2 1259007-035
September 6:
Under Armour Curry 2 "Black" 1259007-003
Under Armour Curry 2 "Warriors" 1259007-422
October 4:
Under Armour Curry 2 "Black" 1259007-004
November 6:
Under Armour Curry 2 1259007-008
- Jun 13, 2013
- 438
- 189
i think this is weird....Not sure how accurate these dates are but the other shoes in the link has the correct RD for the corresponding shoes.
http://www.basket4ballers.com/content/21-calendrier-des-sorties-release-date
August 30:
Under Armour Curry 2 1259007-035
September 6:
Under Armour Curry 2 "Black" 1259007-003
Under Armour Curry 2 "Warriors" 1259007-422
October 4:
Under Armour Curry 2 "Black" 1259007-004
November 6:
Under Armour Curry 2 1259007-008
Curry 2s overlaping with the Curry 1s is a very very bad marketing strategy
add to the fact that one RD is very near yet there are no traces of it in the website is another weird thing
Last edited:
