Search results

theyre legit

im going with fakes, pantone 11's did not come with checkered paper on the second pic looks like the oval laces are much fatter than the retail pairs if these pics are coming from the same seller, i would stay away

these are legit 25th anniversary pures that released in 2010, the production date on tag is correct

those are legit

those are fakes - jumpman on tongue should be light blue - wrong box and label - poor quality materials used

those are the jordan sc-3

those are legit

those are fakes, shape of toebox is horrible, tongue is too short, incorrect size/price sticker, should not have the jordan wing logo anywhere on the box

not authentic, GM pair.  2009 legit space jams should have dark yellow color around the pods under the sole

fakes - wrong box - poor stitching - cut is too low, shape is off - the square box around the jumpman logo on the heel tab should be white, not red - JUMPMAN on the heel tab should be black

fakes shape is off netting should not be shiny tongue is flimsy - it should be more stiff, longer, and red from the inner tongue should outline border of the tongue wrong box - lid should not be attached to the box

they're fake there should be no elephant print surrounding the lace holders

legit

legit

legit

now that you mentioned the stitching, after looking carefully at the 5th picture, the diagonal stitching that runs from the beginning of the sock liner down to the elephant print is not uniform with the rest of the stitching on the upper.  The entire stitching on the upper should be consistent...

based on the pictures, they look good to me the only thing that's throwing me off is the production dates the dates on all the pairs that i own ranges from 09/12 to 12/12 ex. two pairs that i have are dated 09/12/12 and 12/13/12 to me they look legit, but just to be sure we may need...

legit

they're legit

they're legit