Legit. I wouldn't worry about the TWENTY TWELVE if it doesn't appear crooked and all the letters are straight. Production dates are correct, tag looks good and the fading of the plastic tabs is normal. They look good to me.
Respect.
But come on METH, you've been holding this place down for eons, always with that good ish. I know my avy says I joined in 2012, but that's because I lost my old profile in the platform change back then, I've been here since 2003. Mostly a lurker, but us old NT heads know Meth...
Hey, OP, welcome to Niketalk, these kinds of posts should go here: http://niketalk.com/f/7366/jordan-brand-price-fake-checks
Reading is your friend. Enjoy!
Crossing fingers I can scoop a pair on release day, because at $220, I'm retail or bust. Not even gonna front, $220 could go somewhere far more important, but I can't NOT have these in my life.
I have both; beat the heck out the CDP pair because in my opinion, they're superior to the 2011's in every way except one, paint chipping, like @one2manydunks said. It's unavoidable on pretty much all 3's and 4's made during those years but it still frustrates me when it happens so quickly...
Agreed. The Green Glow 4's are another colorway that I don't think would look as clean with Nike Air as they do with the Jumpman. All OG color ways though, no doubt. NA FTW.
Gotta be the Black Cements with that sweet, sweet NA treatment. I'll scoop up some Fire Reds if those are what's being released, but I'm in need of a new pair of BC stat. My CDP pair is straight BEAT.