Search results

Hell no that was the first online only release nike ever had and people went crazy over them , but you also got a sweatshirt and a hat.

I hear you, for me if the mids had only nike branding with no jumpman I would buy them like a lot ..the shape to me is about as far off as the highs are compared to ogs anyways and im only talking about shape in general obviously there a mid cut . I bet that if they had NIke branding just like...

so has anyone taken things back to where all of this sole icing started and tried Sea Glow on the netting. if anything would work that would be the best product to try.

has nothing to do with shape. its the branding, if mids had nike air on the tongue it would be another story. that's honestly the only thing keeping me from ever buying them.

lets face it nie no longer has the og patterns or they would have used them a long time ago, if they don't take time to recreate the base patterns of the shoes they will never be of og geometry. and yes I say patterns because these shoes are cut from flat pieces of material to start not poured...

One thing ive wanted to mention as well that nobody ever discusses, what we need to remember is that when we talk ogs is that these shoes were designed years before they were released, there was tons of time for these Nike to get these shoes perfect and each one being a flagship model in its own...

I dont in any way agree with the logic nike presents, I want the same as you guys, I care less about hype or any collecting aspect of it, I personally just want to wear shoes that I love. I have explained this to Tinker and tons of other people. they just wont give us what we really want it...

I get it trust me these are the exact reasons I have asked him questions like this before, a lot comes in to play in this topic with high power nike executives and its marketing and respect for history are just 2 examples. of course they could make exact replicas. chevy could make brand new 1963...

most of you wont believe me, but what I tell you is the truth. some of you have been given proof in the past that I'm telling you the truth. I have spoke with Tinker about this before and he has stated that we will never see an exact replica of a shoe because Nike does not want the value of the...

the og version circa 2001, Gentry Humphrey hired with Nike mid 90's ..check yourself before you wreck yourself ...you to Gentry.

I remember seeing these at the outlets back in the day for 39.99

no like I said I think this shoe is a wack gentry gimick

yes building a market or building hype for an otherwise unknown shoe. if nike thought there would be any market for these previously they would have released years ago, but they didn't want to admit to the false marketing of the banned aj1s. but now that the general public has figured it out...

nah, I'm just not blinded by hype

Pretty much, just trying to lace the folks that caught that L all in all its not much of a loss.

resellers are just killing the game. this was a wack shoe in 2001 and is a wack shoe now. jeweled wings logo, no og nike air tongue tag. to me, they're the same as a aj1 mid. not even worth my time.

Nike is smart, the air ships were typically a shoe that up until now would have sat, and let's face it if it wasn't for the MJ banned thing or story coming to the surface air ships would have sat. after all Nike lied to the masses for years about what shoe was really banned.. even in 85 they...

all nike would have to do is have the big collab names put their name on the Jordan brand nonflagship models and folks would by that crap. this just goes to show you they could put a name like Union on a turd make them limited not like diarrhea but a solid turd make them ugly color combos and...

Neither were travis scotts, tinker 3's, reflection of champions. what about the air max volt 4's they all got the Nike air treatment. why not every model that originally had it ?

Most IEs have been wack colorways they past 10 years, some colorways wont sit regardless of the model.